Topic: Information sharing and transparency in government, Right to Information;
7. In a democracy, citizens are the rulers of the government and are thus, owners of all the information on public records. Debate in the light of dilution of RTI act, 2005. (150 words)
Reference: The Hindu
Why the question:
This question is part of your static GS-4.
Key Demand of the question:
Bring out the key issues regarding the balance between transparency and secrecy, the right of the public to know and touch upon the recent amendments to RTI act, 2005.
Directive:
Debate –
Weigh up to what extent something is true. Persuade the reader of your argument by citing relevant research but also remember to point out any flaws and counter- arguments as well. Conclude by stating clearly how far you agree with the original proposition.
Structure of the answer:
Introduction:
Begin the answer by right of citizen that the information and data that the government holds.
Body:
In the first part of the body, mention importance of transparency in public records. The right of the public to know the affairs of the government.
Weigh down the balance between transparency and need to maintain the secrecy for the functioning of the government.
Bring out the recent changes to RTI act, 2005 and debate upon Amendments adopted with haste and without much scrutiny and discussion have diluted the RTI Act and reduced transparency in public dealing. At the same time, the amended Act has hit at citizens’ rights and have strengthened hands of the government of the day. Officials, now, are going to be reluctant to give information about the ruling dispensation.
Conclusion:
Conclude with a balanced way forward.
