Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Despite the unsolved tension between Israelis and Palestinians the defining war is a broader struggle among multiple players seeking regional hegemony. Thus, is it right to say that New West Asia today is rife with small state, non-state actors pitted against each other? Analyse.

Topic:  Bilateral, regional and global groupings and agreements involving India and/or affecting India’s interests

1.Despite the unsolved tension between Israelis and Palestinians the defining war is a broader struggle among multiple players seeking regional hegemony. Thus, is it right to say that New West Asia today is rife with small state, non-state actors pitted against each other? Analyse. (250 words)

Reference: Indian Express

Why this question:

More than half a century ago, when analysts talked about war in the Middle East, they referred to a single overarching and permanent tension which existed between Israel and Arab countries like Egypt, Syria, Saudi Arabia and Iraq.

Today, in the new Middle East — and despite the unsolved tension between Israelis and Palestinians — the defining war is a broader struggle among multiple players seeking regional hegemony. Thus the question.

Key demand of the question:

The answer must discuss the changed scenario in the west Asia and in what way it is today at rife with small state, non-state actors pitted against each other.

Directive:

Analyze – When asked to analyse, you have to examine methodically the structure or nature of the topic by separating it into component parts and present them as a whole in a summary.

Structure of the answer:

Introduction:

Briefly explain the implied meaning of New West Asia.

Body:

  • Explain in detail how there are there are fractious groups of militias, religious groups and tribal forces that exercise power in much of the region.
  • These groups have grown vastly in the past 20 years, and many of them have been and continue to be financed and controlled by Iran and Saudi Arabia
  • As a result, contemporary West Asia has been shifting constantly between state actors (Iran, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Iraq and Israel) and non-state actors (the militia groups and local forces) that actually controlled much of the land.
  • At times, non-state actors like the Hezbollah of Lebanon have been more influential than the national governments.
  • Take hints from the article and present your viewpoints.

Conclusion:

Conclude that understanding the geopolitics of the new Middle East is the key to the entire situation.

CategoriesINSIGHTS