Print Friendly, PDF & Email

8) If you don’t have a rational reason to adopt a rational ethics system, you’re failing before you begin. Do you agree. Comment. (250 words)

Topic– Ethics and Human Interface: Essence, determinants and consequences of Ethics in human actions; dimensions of ethics; ethics in private and public relationships.

8) If you don’t have a rational reason to adopt a rational ethics system, you’re failing before you begin. Do you agree. Comment. (250 words)

Reference

Wikipedia

Directive word

Comment- here we have to express our knowledge and understanding of the issue and form an overall opinion thereupon.

Key demand of the question.

The question wants us to form an opinion on the given statement. We can form our opinion in favour of or against the statement but our opinion has to be based on a proper discussion and presentation of valid arguments and facts.

Structure of the answer

Introduction– define rationalist ethics or moral rationalism/ ethical rationalism. E.g Moral rationalism, also called ethical rationalism, is a view in meta-ethics according to which moral principles are knowable a priori, by reason alone.

Body-

Discuss why there is a need to adopt a rational reason/ motivation before undertaking a rationalist ethics approach. E.g Rationality is a -means-, not an ends.  A “rational ethics system” is merely an ethical system based on logic, on reason; the very first step in adopting a rational ethics system is determining -why- you want to adopt a rational ethics system.  “I want to be more rational” is irrational. “I want to know the truth” is a better reason for wanting to be rational; illustrate your point with the example of truth having an inherent value; mention that A rational ethics system must have its axioms.   It is the values that your ethics system seeks to maximize which are its most important axioms etc.

Conclusion– sum up your discussion in a few lines and form a fair and a balanced conclusion on the above issue.